A South Korean consumer group has asked regulators to intervene after alleging that Tesla misled thousands of customers about the availability of Full Self-Driving.

A South Korean consumer group has requested that regulators step in to halt Tesla’s marketing of Full Self-Driving (FSD) to customers whose vehicles cannot legally use the feature, reportedly sparking a broader investigation into the company's advertising practices.
Since 2023, Tesla has sold more than 170,000 Shanghai-made vehicles in Korea, yet only models produced in the United States, such as the Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck, are eligible for FSD under the terms of the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. This discrepancy has led to confusion among buyers, who have been charged a one-time fee of 9.043 million won or a monthly subscription of 150,000 won for FSD, even though the feature was not fully usable for many of them.
Tesla Korea’s country manager noted that FSD functionality is available on approximately 20 percent of Teslas registered in the country. However, the company did not formally seek FSD approval in Korea until October 2023, despite having collected FSD fees from customers for over three years. This delay has raised eyebrows and prompted the Korea Fair Trade Commission to launch an investigation into Tesla’s FSD advertising methods.
Furthermore, Tesla’s FSD does not conform to local safety regulations in Korea, which require drivers to maintain contact with the steering wheel. Despite these constraints, Tesla promoted FSD as 'coming soon' in South Korea without clearly indicating that it was not immediately accessible for the majority of its vehicles. This marketing approach has drawn criticism from consumer advocates, who argue that it constitutes misleading advertising.
In a related development, a Seoul court recently dismissed a lawsuit brought by Tesla owners seeking refunds for the FSD option, citing regulatory and legal restrictions. Meanwhile, a consumer advocacy group has filed a complaint with the Korean Fair Trade Commission regarding Tesla's marketing practices, adding another layer to the ongoing scrutiny of the automaker's operations in South Korea.
Likely accurate — probability of truth 66%, weighted across 16 claims from 2 independent outlets.