A federal judge has tossed out the Department of Justice's lawsuit against Harvard University, which sought to determine if the university was complying with a ban on affirmative action.

In a significant legal development, a federal judge has dismissed the Department of Justice's (DOJ) lawsuit against Harvard University, which aimed to assess whether the prestigious institution was adhering to a court decision prohibiting the use of affirmative action in admissions. This ruling, handed down by Judge Myong Joun, marks a notable setback for the DOJ's efforts to scrutinize Harvard's race-related admissions policies.
The lawsuit, filed in February by the Trump administration, sought access to Harvard's race-related admissions records. However, Judge Joun determined that the DOJ had not taken the necessary preliminary steps required under federal law before filing the lawsuit. This decision underscores the procedural hurdles that government agencies must navigate when challenging universities on matters of admissions policy.
Harvard maintained that it had been cooperative with the DOJ's requests for information, yet the agency proceeded to file the lawsuit nonetheless. The university also faced substantial financial repercussions, with a federal judge deeming $2.6 billion in research funding cuts for 2025 as retaliatory. This financial blow adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal saga surrounding Harvard and the DOJ.
Interestingly, this case is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges faced by Harvard. Earlier in 2026, another lawsuit brought by the DOJ against Harvard concerning allegations of antisemitism was also dismissed. These dismissals highlight the resilience of Harvard in defending itself against various legal challenges.
While the recent ruling does not definitively settle the question of whether Harvard has engaged in discriminatory practices or whether the agencies can pursue specific data, it represents a significant victory for the university in its ongoing legal battles. The decision leaves open the possibility for further legal action, but for now, Harvard can breathe a sigh of relief as it continues to navigate the complex landscape of higher education admissions policy.
Likely accurate — probability of truth 71%, weighted across 10 claims from 2 independent outlets.