The number of species involved in global trade has been found to be more than double previous estimates, highlighting significant information shortages.

A groundbreaking analysis reveals that over 107,000 plant and animal species are part of the global wildlife trade, marking a substantial increase from earlier estimates which placed the figure at around 50,000 species 12. This new data underscores the vast scale of international commerce involving flora and fauna, and highlights the critical need for enhanced monitoring and conservation efforts.
The findings, reported by reputable sources such as The Guardian and Phys.org, indicate that legal wildlife trade holds a much larger economic value compared to its illicit counterpart, being approximately ten times more valuable 2. This disparity suggests a robust market for legally traded species, yet it also points to potential vulnerabilities in regulatory frameworks that could impact biodiversity.
Furthermore, the current global biodiversity framework provides coverage for only about 2% to 3% of the species involved in trade, indicating a significant gap in protection measures 2. This limited scope means that a large majority of traded species may lack adequate safeguards against overexploitation and habitat loss, posing risks to their long-term survival.
Notably, fish stocks make up just a small fraction of the total traded species, accounting for at most 3% 1. This statistic suggests that while aquatic life is certainly part of the global trade network, other types of plants and animals dominate the market, potentially leading to different priorities in conservation strategies.
However, the study also uncovers considerable data gaps, especially concerning the quantity, origin, and population-level data of many traded species 2. These missing pieces of information pose challenges for accurate assessment and management of the global wildlife trade, making it difficult to fully understand the impacts on biodiversity and to develop effective policies.
Likely accurate — probability of truth 74%, weighted across 7 claims from 2 independent outlets.