A cyberattack has raised temperatures in cold-storage chambers at three facilities managed by France's national blood service, EFS, though no health impacts were reported.

A significant cyberattack has disrupted refrigeration systems at three facilities managed by France's national blood service, the Établissement Français du Sang (EFS), raising temperatures in cold-storage chambers to extremely high levels 12. This incident marks the first reported case in France during the second wave of attacks targeting control systems, and notably, it is the first to affect a healthcare organization 2.
The attack did not result in any reported health impacts or loss of blood products, thanks to swift action taken by EFS following the detection of the issue 12. Despite the elevated temperatures, plasma bags intended for transfusions and plasma used to make medicines were either transferred or secured, ensuring that blood collection and distribution operations continued uninterrupted 1.
Interestingly, the EFS itself was not the direct target of the attack; rather, it was the refrigeration supplier that bore the brunt of the cyber intrusion 12. The attackers exploited a vulnerability in a third-party component of Coolworld's software, which controls the refrigeration systems 1. This mirrors a pattern seen in recent cyberattacks affecting refrigeration systems in European supermarkets, where temperature settings were altered or defrost functions activated 1.
In response to the incident, EFS is working closely with France’s national cybersecurity agency (ANSSI) and the Ministry of Health to address the situation and prevent future occurrences 1. The collaboration highlights the interconnected nature of healthcare infrastructure and the critical role played by robust cybersecurity measures in safeguarding public health.
This latest wave of attacks follows a similar pattern to the one observed in October, where food spoilage occurred due to remote defrosting of fridges in various locations 2. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the same perpetrators were responsible for both waves of attacks 2.
Likely accurate — probability of truth 74%, weighted across 16 claims from 2 independent outlets.